Timcast IRL - New Evidence Points To Waukesha Attack Being Terror w/Branca & Posobiec

Enjoy The Healthy Aging Support of Collagen Get 51% Off Here ➡️ http://www.StrongerBonesAndLife.com This is my FAV trusted source ^^^^ Sign Up For …

*For corrections please email [email protected]*

6 responses to “Timcast IRL – New Evidence Points To Waukesha Attack Being Terror w/Branca & Posobiec”

  1. Rokkahorra says:

    Are you trying to invent “Rape Gloves” Tim? Why not just gloves soaked in chloroform? Like what better tool to incapacitate women. . .

  2. Rokkahorra says:

    There’s video of Arberry’s prior “interactions” with police, so it’s more than reasonable to believe he would have attacked them even if they were police. And the case really boils down to whether you believe the state should have a monopoly on the power to arrest people

  3. Rokkahorra says:

    Bail reform needs to go hand in hand with prosecution reform. Prosecutors need to be held liable for frivolous lawsuits (especially since it’s tax payers paying for their grandstanding). And Tim, you are spreading misinformation every time you talk about Baldwin having no reason to fire it. Take a look at the America’s Untold Stories on YT with Marc Grobert, he’s an established journalist, investigative reporter with Hollywood connections and he acquired a copy of the script among many other things relating to the case. Baldwin was practicing a “quick-draw” for the upcoming scene, which was the climactic shootout. That doesn’t absolve him of blame, but it also doesn’t mean he had no reason to be drawing it.

  4. HerrDoktor says:

    “It doesn’t shock you. It’s high voltage, low amps … there’s no pain, your muscles just contract.”

    That is electric shock. Pain doesn’t determine whether electricity is shocking you.

  5. HerrDoktor says:

    “Substantially more people should be remanded, and substantially more people should be released. There’s also gotta be some limitations, like if someone’s a repeat offender, and you’ve got past convictions, then –”
    “That’s almost everybody. Sorry, but as a practical matter, … of the people going through the justice system on any given day, almost none of them is it their first time.”

    1) Tim, you’re hoping judges and magistrates will evaluate this fairly and in harmony with your values. If there’s anything we’ve learned about judges in the past few years, it’s that they are fickle AF and cannot be trusted to rule more in harmony with the Constitution than in harmony with “muh case law.” What was Brooks’ bail when he was released on bail after being charged *FOR JUMPING BAIL??* And, who set that bail?
    2) I don’t understand why Branca thought this was a stopping point — “yeah but most people would be remanded under your system.” YEAH DUDE. THAT’S WHAT TIM IS SAYING. Only people new to the justice system would be released pending trial. The vast majority of other criminal cases would be remanded. People like Brooks would never have had the opportunity to run over parades.

  6. HerrDoktor says:

    The reason leftists are saying “the SUV drove through the parade” instead of “the suspect drove the SUV through the parade” is for the same reason they think banning guns will make this country safer — they believe people have no moral agency and are completely subject to the whims of the tools they wield, which are distinctly good or evil (Imagine believing that there are good tools and evil tools). This is also why they are — in earnest — making the same argument for banning SUVs.