immigration /

Tennessee Lawmaker Moves to End Funding Education for Illegal Immigrant Students

The Supreme Court ruled a student's immigration status could not be used to deny public education in 1982


A state representative in Tennessee has filed a bill that would allow schools to refuse to enroll students who are illegally in the United States.

House Bill 1648 would also permit the state to not fund the education of students with unlawful immigration statuses.

Additionally, local education agencies and “public charter schools that enroll students who are unlawfully present in the United States [would] bear sole financial responsibility for their education” under the bill.

If an LEA [Local Education Agencies] or public charter school chooses to enroll a student who is unlawfully present in the U.S., then the department of education will be required to withhold from the LEA or public charter school, for each such student, the amount representing the per pupil state funds generated through the BEP for the LEA in which the student resides,” the bill reads. “This bill prohibits the department from counting a student who is unlawfully present in the U.S. as part of the BEP calculations for an LEA.”

If the legislation is passed, schools in Tennessee will be required to report the number of enrolled students who are illegally in the country during the 2022-2023 school year. 

Tennessee spends approximately $4.8 billion each year on education.

HB 1648 was introduced by Representative Bruce Griffey, who said in a statement that the bill “focuses on the costly expense of providing free, taxpayer-subsidized public education to illegals in [Tennessee] and calls for defunding it.”

He cited data from the Federation for American Immigration Reform which reported that $383 million from the state’s 2017 education budget was used to educate illegal immigrants.

“As illegals continue to flood across our border in record numbers under the failed policies of the Biden Administration, it is inevitable that this figure is significantly higher in 2021 than it was in 2017,” Griffey said. “Tennesseans should not have to be paying hundreds of millions of dollars in expenses resulting from criminal acts to which the federal government is turning a blind eye.”

The bill was denounced by the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition (TIRRC)

“It’s in the best interest of the communities and our state for all children, regardless of how they came here or where they are from, to have access to education,” said TIRRC, per Tennessee Conservative News. “Time and again, immigrants, refugees, and our allies have stood to stop each one of Rep. Griffey’s anti-immigrant and anti-refugee bills, and this will be no different.”

In 1982, the Supreme Court ruled in Plyler v. Doe that access to free, public education cannot be denied to students based on their immigration status.

Griffey argues that the power to decide if and how to fund illegal immigrants’ education should remain within the purview of state power.

“It is up to the states to decide as a matter of policy whether the state taxpayers should be forced to spend their tax dollars on children of undocumented aliens who are here illegally,” Griffey said.

According to Nashville Scene, “Griffey’s proposal would likely be challenged in the courts, but maybe that’s the point. His attempted attack on the ruling is similar to the assaults on Roe v. Wade that are threatening abortion access across the county. It also comes across as an attack on districts that have higher populations of undocumented immigrants — if they can’t get funding for those students, they’ll have to pay more from their own coffers.”

Griffey, a republican, is serving his second term in office. He announced in November that he will not seek a third term, but is seeking to replace Circuit Court Judge Donald Parish, who is retiring. 

*For corrections please email [email protected]*

5 responses to “Tennessee Lawmaker Moves to End Funding Education for Illegal Immigrant Students”

  1. StephenLonghi says:

    I have a better idea. Kick them out and send them back to their county of origin. If they want to become a citizen they can do it the legal way.

  2. Spiffy says:

    This seems pretty disastrous IMO. I get that the kids going to school is expensive but whats the alternative? Kids going into the fields and to the job sites?

    I think it would be better to educate them, instead of the explosion of crime that will result. This is a difficult decision.

  3. PolishMP731 says:

    Considering the abuse of our govt welfare system, it is past time that we start cutting away some of the leeches.

  4. Garce says:

    I agree with your sentiment that the draws for coming here are the assistances that are provided by the government that are not, or severely lesser, in the immigrants home country. Without those guaranteed provided services, the draw is lessened.

    Similar to countries like Poland or Hungary where illegal aliens are not given these benefits and actively turned away, you do not see much desire for immigration into the country, except by countries with weaker laws that are dealing with the influx and seemingly jealous of these countries. Germany and Belgium come to mind as the primary EU countries pressuring those like Poland or Hungary.

  5. unspecialnoob says:

    One of the large draws that brings illegals here is the government provided benefits like education, healthcare, etc. If those who come here illegally are cut off from accessing that, I think we would see a significant drop in the number of illegals flooding into the country.

    Whether or not that is the right and moral thing to do, I’ll let you decide.