News /

Supreme Court to Hear Challenges to President Biden's Vaccine Mandates

Multiple states, businesses and religious entities are challenging the President's mandates on private employers and health care workers

President Joe Biden’s nationwide mandate that large businesses either require COVID-19 vaccinations or test their workers weekly will be heard by the Supreme Court in January.

The court will also hear arguments regarding a separate vaccine requirement for health care workers at the same time.

The brief court order said the justices will hear oral arguments on January 7 in the two cases, with rulings likely to follow swiftly after.

In both cases, the court delayed action on emergency requests that sought an immediate decision until the new year. 

The federal workplace mandate is currently in effect nationwide, even though multiple circuit courts have made attempts to block the mandate previously.

The challenges are set to be heard by Justice Brett Kavanaugh and come to the court amid the nation’s recent surge of the Omicron variant of COVID. 

On Friday, an appeals court allowed the workplace mandate, which covers 80 million American workers, to go into effect. This prompted businesses, states and other groups challenging the policy to ask the Supreme Court to block it.

Twenty-seven primarily GOP-led states, various businesses and business groups are among those challenging the mandate. There are also two large religious entities, including the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, challenging the policy. 

Last week, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati ruled to remove the injunction that blocked the workplace rule, affecting more than 100 employers. The rule is being implemented by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA).

The health care worker rule has been challenged by primarily GOP-led states. The rule required more than two million unvaccinated health care workers to receive a first vaccine dose by Dec. 6, 2021, or be at risk of losing employment. 

The basis of the arguments to be heard in both mandates rests on whether the Secretary of Labor and entities like OSHA have the right to enforce a requirement on employees to undergo a permanent medical procedure to maintain employment. 

*For corrections please email [email protected]*

8 responses to “Supreme Court to Hear Challenges to President Biden’s Vaccine Mandates”

  1. HerrDoktor says:

    Uh huh. And what recourse will people have who were forced out of their jobs by overzealous bootlicking companies for the crime of not allowing their bodily autonomy to be violated?

  2. TuckR8 says:

    I think even the most adamant cult members admitted the mandates are unconstitutional/illegal before the idea was really taken seriously. I just don’t see a reasonable argument to say the current mandates are constitutional.

    Not to say blue cities/states won’t have their jack-booted thugs enforce them anyways.

  3. pandusa says:

    Yeah, but are they going to attend to” We THE PEOPLES” agenda…or their OWN?

  4. Wolv256 says:

    Are you sure about that? I heard the Supreme Court has a vaccine mandate to go to work too and they got sent home because they didn’t want to get the vax. Checkmate!

  5. Spidge_Bandersnatch says:

    my first comment was in response to MarbleCreekMonarch.

  6. Spidge_Bandersnatch says:

    Right. Is anyone challenging Merrick Garland’s use of the FBII against parents who complain at school board meetings?

  7. ApecoreBreakdown says:

    If i am no longer allowed to work while unvaccinated i will still have to eat and afford my basic necessities. I will be forced to steal. I’ve never stolen before in my life, but im a hungry boy and i gotta eat.

  8. marblecreekmonarch says:

    We’ll see. I’m in a way no longer confident in the Supreme Court after the past two years of their exposure and how they determine what they’ll hear or not and those reasons why. I’ve learned a lot around the process and how they’re willing to let certain cases fall through the cracks if it’s too divisive of a topic. Not only this, but why are there already so many unconstitutional laws and mandates not aggressively and proactively challenged.