Climate Change /

Study: Impact Of Emissions Scenarios On Antarctic Sea Ice Won't Be Felt This Century


The impact of different emissions scenarios on Antarctic sea ice will not be detectable for nearly 200 years, according to new research from climate experts.

The study, led by GNS Science’s Dr. Dan Lowry, found that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) low emissions scenario, RCP2.6, and their high emissions scenario, RCP8.5, have “indistinguishable” effects on the contribution of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) to a rise in sea levels.

The researchers estimate that “the point in time when the difference between the medians of the scenarios is greater than the 95% [confidence interval] of the RCP2.6 scenario” is not until 2189.

According to Michael Shellenberger, a leading climate and environmental activist, the findings illustrate just how long it takes for the impacts of climate change to take effect – a much longer timescale than what is often portrayed in the media.

“I think what people are a little bit surprised to learn is that the biggest climate change impacts will not occur this century,” Shellenberger told Timcast.

He said the “bigger news” is that “we just will not have as much global warming as people were worried we were going to have.”

According to the 2021 IPCC report, the high emission scenarios – such as RCP8.5 or SSP5-8.5 – are now considered unlikely, signifying a complete reversal from the IPCC’s 2013 report that identified these extreme scenarios as our most likely future.

“So the reason the IPCC report basically said the really scary-sounding scenarios are just not going to happen is because it’s just highly unlikely that the planet is going to warm more than 3 degrees Celsius above pre industrial levels,” Shellenberger said.

The 2021 IPCC report notes that under current policies, global warming is falling “in line” with intermediate scenarios – RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and SSP2-4.5 – that estimate warming of 2.7 °C by 2100.

“To have really high levels of warming – say above 3 degrees or above 4 degrees – we would have to sextuple the amount of coal that we’re currently using, whereas the amount of coal we are going to be using is going to go down,” Shellenberger explained. “Now it is going to slightly increase this year and the next due to the energy shortage driven by renewables.”

According to the IPCC report, the SSP3-7.0 scenario – which estimates warming of 3.6 °C by 2100 – and the SSP5-8 – which estimates warming of 4.4 °C by 2100 – rely on 2.4x and 6.2x increases in per capita coal consumption, respectively. Meanwhile, in a report estimating future fuel consumption, the International Energy Agency predicts global coal consumption to “decline in all scenarios” after 2025.

Shellenberger said that he believes “the panic over [sea] ice has been one of the most ridiculous aspects of climate alarmism.” He added that in the “competitive space” of climate alarmism, melting sea ice is “up there with the panic over sea level rise [and] the ridiculous concerns about hurricanes.”

It should be noted that the IPCC’s report also could not detect an increase in the long-term frequency or severity of tropical cyclones.

Shellenberger explained, “People worry about the Greenland ice sheet and the west Antarctic ice sheet,” but most “people don’t realize” it is expected to take thousands of years “for those ice sheets to melt.”

“That’s plenty of time – to put it mildly – to adapt,” Shellenberger said. “I mean, humans might not even be on Earth in a thousand years, we just don’t know. The idea that we should be worried about things a thousand years from now – does anybody think that Europeans in 1100 should have been worried about what life would be like in 2100? It’s absurd.”

*For corrections please email corrections@timcast.com*

9 responses to “Study: Impact Of Emissions Scenarios On Antarctic Sea Ice Won’t Be Felt This Century”

  1. JRPatriot says:

    As a meteorologist I have known this for years, but to be fair anyone who has common sense can easily figure it out if you actually do research. Back in college we were shown data that would make you be worried, but then with maturity you realize that data is easily manipulated and outright false half the time. I mean of course the people who do most of the studies want to come to a conclusion that makes everyone freak out about climate change, because it fills their pockets.

  2. chickens.forever says:

    Maybe blowhard politicians and their elitist buddies need to quit blowing so much hot air and jet setting around the globe on their private jets to secret meetings and remote islands so they can practice their pagan ways and pedo practices. Until then……….. Suck it.

  3. Sgg69 says:

    We’re all doomed !! We only have 8 years left !! The end is nigh !! This can all be stopped if…..you vote for ME !!

    • chickens.forever says:

      Ya…. Hear that same schtick back in the 80’s, then our kids heard it when they were in school in the 90’s and our grandkids who are now in grade school are getting the same “8 year”, “5 year”, “2 years” blah blah nonsense. First it was the hole in the ozone layer, global warming, global cooling, climate change and now if I’m not mistaken the “elitist” are working on coming up with a new PR campaign and catch phrase as none of the others have worked and not a single one of their dire predictions have come to pass. Our family…. We’ve taken a few deep dives into solar cycles, reversal of earths polarity, el nino’s la nina’s and have one kid with a degree in medical anthropology, wife who’s a RNA and a cache of friends who are all twice as educated as me and I LOVE the conversations and ways in which they all laugh at and debunk all this nonsense. Water, air and ground pollution………. Legitimate problems all with simple solutions that nobody at the government levels seem to care about. Pushing climate gloom and doom scenarios ALL OF WHICH seem to end with us being taxed and restricted into serfdom while the elite get to keep their toys, their ways and yes…… ALL our money.

  4. NoOne123 says:

    “we just will not have as much global warming as people were worried we were going to have.”

    doomer climate change activists on suicide watch lmfao xD

  5. Wolv256 says:

    Yeah, but they put underage retarded Swiss girls in charge of this stuff and they don’t know how to comprehend studies.

    • chickens.forever says:

      Correction…… “Mentally challenged” and “completely uneducated” swiss cheese girl who openly said she was refusing to attend school until she got her way with all her climate nonsense! Her parents and the establishment elites should of all been charged with child abuse some years back if you ask me. My kids and grandkids have all looked at her public tantrums/rants and then her convulsing when singing “Never gonna give you up” and all said……….. “Dude, that chick is totally re-tar-ded”!