Legal /

Ohio Supreme Court Rules Drugs in Systems Does Not Prove Drug Possession

The court says a person is no longer in control of a drug after they consume it


Ohio Supreme Court / Wikimedia Commons / Analogue Kid

The Ohio Supreme Court vacated the felony cocaine possession conviction of a woman who tested positive for cocaine while giving birth at a hospital.

Kelly Foreman went to Mercy Health Tiffin Hospital in Seneca County to deliver her baby, J.B., in 2018. He showed signs of drug withdrawal at birth. Cocaine metabolites, the compounds produced when the body metabolizes cocaine, were found in J.B.’s urine and feces as well as in his umbilical cord tissue.

“Because (her child) tested positive for illegal substances, Megan Steyer, who was a protective-services caseworker with the Seneca County Department of Job and Family Services, interviewed Foreman. Steyer testified that Foreman admitted to using cocaine 6 to 12 times while she was pregnant, with the most recent use having been about two weeks before (her child’s) birth,” the ruling said.

Foreman and her legal team argued the state did not prove jurisdiction by failing to prove she possessed cocaine in the county.

The Supreme Court said the fact that she lived in Seneca County during her pregnancy and gave birth there did not offer sufficient evidence.

Foreman’s fiancé testified that he was unaware of her drug use and a protective-services caseworker said she claimed to have never used drugs in front of her children. Foreman also said she never used the drugs in her home.

The prosecution also did not present any evidence concerning the amount of time that cocaine metabolites remain in a person’s system after ingesting it or establish Foreman’s whereabouts during such a timeframe,” per Court News Ohio.

“Foreman, by her own admission, ingested cocaine several times during her pregnancy,” Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor wrote. “However, once she ingested the cocaine and it was assimilated into her body, she no longer had control over it.”

“Consequently, at the time of J.B.’s birth, Foreman was unable to exercise restraint, direct influence, or exert power over the cocaine that she had previously ingested,” she said.

The court’s decision was unanimous.

The ACLU of Ohio filed an amicus brief in Foreman’s favor in the case. In the brief, the organization argued it was cruel and unusual punishment to charge someone with drugs within their systems with drug possession.

In a statement following the court’s decision, ACLU of Ohio attorney David Carey said “That ruling is not limited to pregnant women and newborns; it would apply to anyone.”

“If the prosecution had its way, a person could be found to ‘possess’ a drug merely by having it in their system, regardless of where, when, and under what circumstances the drug was actually ingested,” he said. “If that was the law, a person could take a substance in a place where it is legal to do so, and could later be arrested in any county in Ohio simply for being there, for as long as the substance or its byproducts existed in their system. The court rightly saw that as an absurd result.”

Foreman was originally sentenced to three years of community control by a Seneca County trial court. The decision was upheld by the Third District Court of Appeals. Child abuse or child endangerment charges were not filed against Foreman.

*For corrections please email corrections@timcast.com*

5 responses to “Ohio Supreme Court Rules Drugs in Systems Does Not Prove Drug Possession”

  1. drspinaltap says:

    what a load of crap. drugs are illegal for a reason. so if the drugs are in your body you no longer possess them? isnt that what floyd did? he got caught, so shoved all the drugs in is mouth. great results right?

    why don’t we have some common sense drug reform. if you have drugs in your system; go to prison. if you have drugs in your possession; go to prison.

    punishing crimes make people not want to do crime, not punishing crimes encourages crime.

    get serious about law enforcement, if you want drugs to be legal, change the law (democracy). Do not pick and choose which laws are enforced and not enforced (tyranny).

    • Gimmemabrewski says:

      I’m in no way condoning her use of drugs while pregnant (stupid and should be charged with child endangerment), I think the ruling was correct. Imagine if you just got back from somewhere where that drug was legal, which is a very valid defense imo. Drugs can be detectable for long after the effects go away. And I live in Ohio so I think that means my opinion matters… 🤔😆

  2. pandusa says:

    Oh well, that should be good news to airline pilots, surgeons, the military, drunk/impaired drivers…slippery slope. Unfortunately, many drug addicts commit crimes- even murder to support their habit because they cannot sustain employment. We have to draw the line somewhere. Where?

  3. Johnli says:

    Honestly, drugs should not be illegal. Makes no sense these people have a drug problem, they are not criminals.

  4. NeverMetTheGuy says:

    I hate this shit, but I looooove the way it smells.

    But seriously, guys where you get charged for having drugs IN your system? China. China does that shit. Sure, people shouldn’t be partying while they’re fucking pregnant, but the main issue is drugs IN your system isn’t possession.

    Moral of the story – NEVER carry cocaine. You have to store it in your face, because that’s not possession.