New York Election Officials Retract Democratic Primary Totals, Claim 135,000 Test Ballots Were Counted


By Cassandra Fairbanks

Election officials in New York City have retracted Tuesday night’s early result total for the ranked-choice Democratic mayoral primary after 135,000 test ballots were counted.

Officials say that the fake data was never cleared from a computer system after a test run.

The Associated Press reported on Tuesday evening that “the bungle was a black mark on New York City’s first major foray into ranked choice voting and seemed to confirm worries that the city’s Board of Elections, which is jointly run by Democrats and Republicans, was unprepared to implement the new system.”

With the ranked choice system, voters can select up to five candidates and place them in order of their preference.

“Since no candidate was the first choice of more than 50% of voters, a computer on Tuesday tabulated ballots in a series of rounds that worked like instant run-offs,” the AP explained. “In each round, the candidate in last place was eliminated. Votes cast for that person were then redistributed to the surviving candidates, based on whoever voters put next on their ranking list. That process repeated until only two candidates were left.”

The erroneous totals had indicated that former police captain and Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams had lost a major portion of his lead and that former sanitation commissioner Kathryn Garcia was just 16,000 votes behind him.

Adams is a moderate Democrat who has rejected the far-left’s calls to “defund the police.” His campaign has vowed to fight crime, while also addressing “racial injustice” in law enforcement.

Adams was the first to call for an explanation when the early totals were reported.

“The vote total just released by the Board of Elections is 100,000-plus more than the total announced on election night, raising serious questions,” Adams said in a statement. “We have asked the Board of Elections to explain such a massive increase and other irregularities before we comment on the Ranked Choice Voting projection.”

The Board of Elections issued a statement about the mistake just before 10:30 p.m.

“Board staff has removed all test ballot images from the system and will upload election night results, cross-referencing against election night reporting software for verification. The cast vote record will be re-generated and the [ranked-choice voting] rounds will be re-tabulated,” the statement said. “The Board apologizes for the error and has taken immediate to [sic] ensure the most accurate up to date results are reported.”

The Republican primary has already concluded, with Curtis Sliwa, founder of the Guardian Angels, taking the nomination.

For corrections, please email [email protected]

*For corrections please email [email protected]*

13 responses to “New York Election Officials Retract Democratic Primary Totals, Claim 135,000 Test Ballots Were Counted”

  1. KDiddy says:

    Ranked voting would be great, but first people need to educated on how to do it right and what is going to take. If you allow 5 candidates, you could end up counting all the ballots 3 times unless you somehow managed to remember everyone’s choices and how they were ranked. That’s a lot of counting, even for a computer. Do that for 160 million Americans… might not be too easy

  2. BFairfax123 says:

    So what their really saying is they weren’t happy with the results of the primary so they found a reason to do it again . Does anyone think that if the ultra progressive candidate had won we’d actually have ever found out about this mistake ?

  3. frodolai says:

    most fair Rats election. lmao

  4. RatherDashing says:

    Certainly inspires confidence…

  5. Rohanhub says:

    You mean we can’t trust the election system?? Well color me surprised !

  6. MaineWolf says:

    Fortify the elections and then use their own fortifications to cheat their own. no. honor. amongst. thieves.

    Good Day

  7. RocketMonk says:

    I think rank-choice voting is a big step forward for a truly democratic voting process. If this kind of voting is implemented at a federal level for presidential elections, it has the power to truly disrupt the dominance of the two-party monopoly, reduce the lobbying influence of corporate interests, allow for 3rd-party candidates to actually have a chance and help give power back to the people. I hope whatever peculiarities were found in this election won’t overshadow the incredible value of rank-choice voting, so that integrity can be restored to the electoral process.

  8. Will_Was_Here says:

    You would think after all that happened in the past year they would have fixed all their errors.

    Seems instead of that they seem to just be “fixing” elections.

  9. CalDelt says:

    “fake data was never cleared”. Data is plural. Copy editor, guys.

  10. henk says:

    oh another fraudulent election. I NEVER SAW THIS COMING

  11. Feddy_Von_Wigglestein says:

    Blue states can’t run elections, this is nothing new.

  12. Jeremyrachel says:

    Just another reason me and my lady dont trust the system. Shes mostly spanish, understands how socialism starts. Were seeing it before our eyes

  13. Tlino says:

    This isn’t a surprise.