Washington Home Owner Now Required To Disclose Internet Service During Sale

Concerns about internet access are now a reason for a potential buyer to rescind an offer


Under a new law, people selling their homes in Washington will have to disclose information detailing their internet service.

Homeowners will news to report if their property has internet access as well as who is their internet provider. 

The policy, House Bill 1064, passed unanimously in both houses of the state’s legislature in April of 2020. Starting on Jan. 1, information regarding a home’s internet access will be disclosed as part of the pending sale. If the information is a concern, potential buyers have three days following the seller’s disclosure to withdraw their offer in writing.

The seller’s disclosure form already includes the typical questions about the infrastructure and integrity of the home and property, including if it is on a sewer or septic system, if it gets water from a public system or well, whether the house has ever been flooded or caught fire and if the electrical and plumbing systems are in working order,” notes The Center Square.

The disclosure form does not require a seller to give details about internet quality, access speed, or alternative providers.

The new disclosure is the latest in an array of efforts by lawmakers across the country to respond to our increasing reliance on home internet connectivity for work, education and entertainment,” reports CNET. “That internet connection has become even more critical during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has upended the lives of billions of people, forcing quarantines and lockdowns as people adjust to a new normal of daily life.”

Internet access is not supervised in real estate transactions the way utilities have been, including electric, HVAC, and water.

For almost two years, COVID-19 and the increase of remote workers triggered a wave of relocations from urban cities to suburban and rural communities. 

According to Forbes, “With workers no longer expected to show up in person, at least not daily, where they choose to live will continue to change. Since the start of the pandemic, thousands of people have moved, with urban centers like San Francisco and New York City experiencing the greatest losses and nearby suburban areas experiencing the greatest gains. While many people have been heading for the suburbs, rural and remote communities have also welcomed a high number of new residents.”

Remote workers are, however, dependent on reliable internet access for their livelihood. Surveys indicated that up to 56% of the nation’s workforce could work remotely, internet access remains a significant barrier to lifestyle change. Data indicates that about one-third of Americans say they can not work from home because they do not have high-speed internet.

*For corrections please email [email protected]*

10 responses to “Washington Home Owner Now Required To Disclose Internet Service During Sale”

  1. Gregreh says:

    I don’t have a big problem with this considering other utilities already have to be disclosed. Where I live (another blue state lol) our internet providers are regulated and considered public utilities already. Simply disclosing the availability of the utility isn’t an unreasonable point of documentation assuming it is in fact a regulated utility in the area.

  2. HerrDoktor says:

    And here I was starting to feel silly for being “that guy” who said the left will declare Internet access to be a human right. This is one step closer.

  3. DangerousDan says:

    As a WA resident *facepalm*

  4. bedwablackburn says:

    So… Over under on how many months till a homeowner sues an ISP over multiple declined offers? I say 6 months and at least 5 declined offers.

  5. Sinn13 says:

    Well that’s WA state for you. Overlegislated, overtaxed and for me just plain over it.

  6. Will_Was_Here says:

    I’m either illiterate or someone need to proofread “Homeowners will news to report if their property has internet access as well as who is their internet provider. “

  7. dketzer says:

    isnt this one of the first things renters check out? why wouldnt someone looking to BUY the place do likewise?

  8. Cat_R_Pillar says:

    IDK, I feel like the person selling should tell people if the area gets internet service or not, just like they tell you what other appliances and services are available… but I don’t see why the government needs to be involved, just ask before you buy… Knowing our government, they probably wrote the law so they can get access to your search history and look through everything on your computer.

  9. Garce says:

    Agreed with Boxed. Like seriously, this is just another hoop forcing homeowners who are selling to jump through. Just another instance of bringing the standards down to fit the lowest level instead of encouraging everyone to strive for the top.

    If someone bought a house without checking for utilities and services before buying the house, it’s their own fault and deserve to suffer the consequences, but you’ll be damn sure they check the next time they move or their friends or family buy a house. Not being forced to suffer consequences for the actions one takes has lead this society into the gutters.

  10. boxed says:

    This is stupid. It shoudl be the buyers burden to reseach the area and make sure the services they desire are available at the location. What’s next? “Which Pizza places deliver to this address”?